Proof Without Content
There's also a proof without content of a conjecture without content, but it's left as an exercise for the reader.
There's also a proof without content of a conjecture without content, but it's left as an exercise for the reader.
This comic refers to proofs without words, which rely on images or other geometric tools to visually demonstrate a concept without further explanation. The comic gives an example of a proof without any content at all, which proves its own existence. The empty box could be construed as the rectangle denoting what has been proved ('QED'), and since it is part of the diagram, it avoids being content. However, it claims to be a convincing proof, in which it might fall a bit short.
Note that this conjecture cannot be generalized and the proof only proves this special case: the vast majority of all other conjectures cannot be proven without content.[proof needed] This proof requires the conjecture to be stated, which could be construed as content.
This could be a parody on scientists sometimes creating empty papers as an inside joke, such as a comprehensive overview of chemical-free consumer products – the point with that paper being that the lay meaning behind "chemical-free" can be considered technically nonsensical, given that anything physical contains chemical elements, so no products can be free of them. (And, even in the various more vague senses that may be intended, it isn't necessarily as good a selling point as it may try to suggest.) Another example of an academic article without words is The Unsuccessful Self-Treatment of a Case of "Writer's Block".
The title text refers to another proof without content, that a conjecture without content could exist. This would imply a conjecture-proof pair with no content whatsoever. This could only be discussed indirectly, which is why it is mentioned and left as an exercise for the reader. Alternatively, the exercise could be forming the conjecture and proof itself if the comic is interpreted as a blank sheet of paper.